
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains a disease with poor survival. The pathogenesis is complex and encompasses multiple molecular pathways. The first-generation antifibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib, approved more than 10 years ago, have been shown to reduce the rate of progression, increase the length of life for patients with IPF, and work for other fibrotic lung diseases. In the last two decades, most clinical trials on IPF have failed to meet the primary endpoint and an urgent unmet need remains to identify agents or treatment strategies that can stop disease progression. The pharmacotherapeutic landscape for IPF is moving forward with a number of new drugs currently in clinical development, mostly in phase I and II trials, while only a few phase III trials are running. Since our understanding of IPF pathogenesis is still limited, we should keep focusing our efforts to deeper understand the mechanisms underlying this complex disease and their reflection on clinical phenotypes. This review discusses the key pathogenetic concepts for the development of new antifibrotic agents, presents the newest data on approved therapies, and summarizes new compounds currently in clinical development. Finally, future directions in antifibrotics development are discussed.
Phenotype, Pyridones, Medizin, Humans, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Phenotype [MeSH] ; Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/metabolism [MeSH] ; Leading Article ; Pyridones/therapeutic use [MeSH], Leading Article, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Phenotype, Pyridones, Medizin, Humans, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Phenotype [MeSH] ; Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/metabolism [MeSH] ; Leading Article ; Pyridones/therapeutic use [MeSH], Leading Article, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 110 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
