
doi: 10.1002/lary.25022
pmid: 25388367
Objectives/HypothesisTo estimate the risk of surgically treated middle ear cholesteatoma in individuals with a nonsyndromic orofacial cleft and in their siblings compared with the general population.Study DesignHistorical cohort study.MethodsUsing the unique civil registration number for linkage, data from three national registers were used for the Danish 1936–2009 birth cohorts. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with Cox regression analyses using age as the underlying time variable. Individuals were followed from January 1, 1977 until time of surgically treated cholesteatoma, and censored at emigration, death, or end of follow‐up (December 31, 2010).ResultsA total of 8,593 individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial cleft and 6,989 siblings were identified, undergoing 201 and 21 first‐time cholesteatoma surgeries, respectively. A 5% random sample of the Danish population comprising 249,708 persons without an orofacial cleft was created, and 175,724 siblings to these persons were identified. These controls underwent 485 and 332 first‐time cholesteatoma surgeries, respectively. For individuals with cleft lip and palate the HR for cholesteatoma surgery was 14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12–18) and for individuals with cleft palate the HR was 20 (95% CI, 16–24) when compared with the random sample. In siblings of individuals with cleft palate, the HR for cholesteatoma surgery was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1–4.1) when compared with siblings of the random sample.ConclusionsA 20‐fold increase in the risk of cholesteatoma was found in individuals with cleft palate, whereas cleft lip did not pose a risk of cholesteatoma. Furthermore, the study indicates an increased risk of cholesteatoma in unaffected siblings of individuals with cleft palate.Level of Evidence2bLaryngoscope, 125:1225–1229, 2015
Male, Cleft Lip/complications, Cleft Lip, Denmark, cleft lip, Risk Assessment, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Risk Factors, Humans, Registries, orofacial cleft, Risk Assessment/methods, Cholesteatoma, siblings, Retrospective Studies, cleft palate, register, Cleft Palate/complications, Incidence, Siblings, Cholesteatoma/epidemiology, Denmark/epidemiology, Cleft Palate, middle ear, Eustachian tube, Female, cleft lip and palate, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Cleft Lip/complications, Cleft Lip, Denmark, cleft lip, Risk Assessment, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Risk Factors, Humans, Registries, orofacial cleft, Risk Assessment/methods, Cholesteatoma, siblings, Retrospective Studies, cleft palate, register, Cleft Palate/complications, Incidence, Siblings, Cholesteatoma/epidemiology, Denmark/epidemiology, Cleft Palate, middle ear, Eustachian tube, Female, cleft lip and palate, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
