
An attempt was made to investigate the process of forming porous polymeric membrane by computer simulation experiments based on Monte Carlo method. In this approach secondary particles (i.e., polymer-rich phase; referred to as polymer particles) and vacant particles (i.e., polymer-lean phase) are assumed to have the same radius S2 and the number ratio of those particles is predetermined by two-phase volume ratio R (≡V(1)/V(2); V(1) and V(2) are volumes of polymer-lean and -rich phases, respectively). These particles are arranged randomly on a hypothetical hexagonally closest packing lattice plane and all pores consisting of x vacant particles, which are referred to as “vacant particle pores,” are counted one by one to give probability of appearance of NP Vacant-particle pores in unit area of membrane, Q(NP), from which expected value of NP, {NP} are determined. Probability P(x) that a given pore contains x vacant particles and the average of number of vacant particles in one pore, x are also determined. In the range of R≤0.4, the theory on pore size distribution, proposed by Iijima, Matsuda, and Kamide in a previous paper, gives the same curves of P(x), NP, and x (accordingly, number-average pore radius of wet membrane, {rWet,1}) as those by the simulation, meaning that the theory holds its validity with respect to pore size distribution N(r) (r, radius of pore) and NP. Morphology and P(x) of the piled plane are shown to be practically the same as those of a hypothetical thin plane directly formed at an apparent phase volume ratio RA, evaluated from the number ratio of polymer particles and vacant particles on the surface of the piled plane by taking into consideration of overlapping. It is ascertained that computer experiments can produce membranes with morphology very similar to actual membranes and we can evaluate, by computer simulation, accurately the morphology and pore size distribution using RA, in place of R.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
