
OBJECTIVES. To characterize the use of high-fidelity mannequins and standardized patients in US pharmacy colleges and schools. METHODS. A survey instrument was sent to 105 doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) programs to collect data on the use of simulation and to identify barriers to using simulation-based teaching methods. RESULTS. Eighty-eight colleges and schools completed the survey instrument (response rate 84%). Of these, 14 did not use high-fidelity mannequins or standardized patients within the curriculum. Top barriers were logistical constraints and high resource cost. Twenty-three colleges and schools used simulation for introductory pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs), 34 for interprofessional education, and 68 for evaluation of at least 1 core competency prior to advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). CONCLUSIONS. Although the majority of US colleges and schools of pharmacy use simulation-based teaching methodologies to some extent in the pharmacy curricula, the role of simulation in IPPEs, interprofessional education, and assessment of competency-based skills could be expanded.
Schools, Computer Simulation - utilization, Computer Simulation - standards, Pharmacy - methods, 610, Pharmacy, Manikins, United States, Education, Curriculum - standards, Students, Pharmacy, Education, Pharmacy, Schools, Pharmacy, 615, Humans, Computer Simulation, Curriculum, Students, Pharmacy - standards
Schools, Computer Simulation - utilization, Computer Simulation - standards, Pharmacy - methods, 610, Pharmacy, Manikins, United States, Education, Curriculum - standards, Students, Pharmacy, Education, Pharmacy, Schools, Pharmacy, 615, Humans, Computer Simulation, Curriculum, Students, Pharmacy - standards
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
