
doi: 10.15760/honors.797
There have been numerous efforts to accomplish the task of visual grounding (Deng et al., 2018, Johnson et al., 2015, Krishna et al., 2018), the act of matching regions or objects within an image with natural language queries. But with each method released, there is a growing uncertainty about the effectiveness of the machine’s learning. Are computers learning what we expect, and are datasets properly testing this learning? (Cirik et al., 2018). In this thesis, I analyze the visual grounding method of “Referring Relationships†(RR) by Krishna et al. (2018). I find that RR’s relationship information does not have a significant positive impact on performance as compared to a baseline model that only detects objects. In addition, I find that the Visual Relationship Detection dataset (VRD), one of the datasets used in the original paper, exhibits bias. In other words, it allows methods that do not utilize relationships to perform well, showing that the VRD dataset is not able to properly test the RR method.
Natural language processing (Computer science), Image processing -- Data processing, Machine learning -- Evaluation
Natural language processing (Computer science), Image processing -- Data processing, Machine learning -- Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
