
handle: 11583/2996605
Breast cancer stands as a predominant health concern for women globally. As mammography is the primary screening tool for breast cancer detection, improving the detection of breast cancer at screening could save more lives. This mammography review paper comprehensively reviews computer-aided techniques during a specific time frame for the segmentation and classification of microcalcification, evaluating image processing, machine learning, and deep learning techniques. The review is meticulously carried out, adhering closely to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This article focuses on mammographic breast cancer detection approaches based on automated systems, discussed chronologically from 1970 through 2023. This article encompasses the breadth of artificial intelligence-based methods from the most primitive to the most sophisticated models. Image processing and machine learning-based methods are comprehensively reviewed. Evaluating a deep learning architecture based on self-extracted features for classification tasks demonstrated outstanding performance. Large-scale datasets required for a broader and in-depth analysis of novel methods for breast cancer detection are also discussed in this article. This research work is aligned with the United Nations’ sustainability development goals.
Breast cancer; Mammography; Microcalcification; Deep learning; Convolution neural networks; Machine learning, microcalcification, convolution neural networks, Breast cancer, machine learning, mammography, deep learning, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TK1-9971
Breast cancer; Mammography; Microcalcification; Deep learning; Convolution neural networks; Machine learning, microcalcification, convolution neural networks, Breast cancer, machine learning, mammography, deep learning, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
