
Contents, present in biblical texts, are data, accessible to rational knowledge, and hence — object of philosophical hermeneutics of texts as such. Taking into account the supra-temporal way of existing of texts, a researcher is akin to know, “how it is indeed”, coming out of the direct meaning of text, and basing on the philological fact, that words have their primary meaning, which correctly reflects things and states of affairs in reality. A rational reflection makes to its research’ object the tradition of “exactly such interpretation of texts” and spellings of authorities, goes beyond their frames and checks them on their unimpeachability. Such checking is a “reasonable service” (cf.: Rom 12, 1): usage of the reflexive ability of reason, which belongs to human personhood as image of God.
розумна служба., раціональна рефлексія, rational reflexion, texts as data, tradition, BT10-1480, reasonable service., direct meaning, content’s unity, Christianity, стани речей у дійсності, критика ідеології, critics of ideology, авторитет, hermeneutical circle, мотивація текстуальних формулювань, rational knowledge, Doctrinal Theology, змістовна єдність, motivation of textual formulations, BR1-1725, тексти як дані, герменевтичне коло, раціональне пізнання, states of affairs in reality, authority, пряме значення, традиція
розумна служба., раціональна рефлексія, rational reflexion, texts as data, tradition, BT10-1480, reasonable service., direct meaning, content’s unity, Christianity, стани речей у дійсності, критика ідеології, critics of ideology, авторитет, hermeneutical circle, мотивація текстуальних формулювань, rational knowledge, Doctrinal Theology, змістовна єдність, motivation of textual formulations, BR1-1725, тексти як дані, герменевтичне коло, раціональне пізнання, states of affairs in reality, authority, пряме значення, традиція
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
