
Abstract This study presents an autonomous fault detection method for a wide range of common failures and defects which are visually visible on PV modules. In this paper, we focus especially on detection of bird’s drops as a very typical defect on the PV modules. As a crucial prerequisite, a data-set of aerial imageries of the PV strings affected by bird’s drops were collected through several experimental flight by multi-copters in order to train an accurate fully convolutional deep network. These images are divided into three groups, namely, training, testing, and validation parts. For the purpose of bird’s drops segmentation, an improved encoder-decoder architecture is employed. In this regard, a modified VGG16 model is used as a backbone for the encoder part. The encoder of the network has a very flexible architecture that can be modified and trained for any other visual failure detection. Later on, extracted feature maps of images are imported into a decoder network to map the low resolution features to full resolution ones for pixel-wise segmentation. In addition, an image object positioning algorithm is presented to find the exact position of detected failures in local coordinate system. In a post-processing step, the detected damages are prioritized based on various parameters such as severity of shading and extent of impact on the PV module’s output current. For further validation, different affected PV modules were characterized according to the output patterns of the classification step in order to accurately evaluate the effect of birds’ drops and consequent shading on the parameters of PV modules based on their severity and location. Finally, the training and testing results demonstrate that the proposed FCN network is able to predict precisely covered pixels by bird’s drops on PV modules at pixel level with average accuracies of 98% and 93% for training and testing, respectively.
620
620
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
