Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The intensive use of flexographic printing for packaging decoration and the increased consumer demands for it require an in-depth study of the factors that influence the prints’ quality. In this paper, we examined the test prints obtained at a flexographic proofer. Images on cardboard were printed by the environmentally friendly inks made by a Ukrainian manufacturer. The effect of the cardboard surface layer on the microgeometry of the prints created by cyan, yellow, black, and magenta inks has been shown. It has been established that the roughness parameter Ra for a two-layer coated cardboard is reduced by 3 times as compared to the uncoated cardboard. The photographs of the microstructure of the prints’ surface, their profile demonstrate a significant effect of the chalked coating on the image quality. It has been confirmed that the ink layer smooths out the micro-roughness of the print surface. However, when printed on the uncoated cardboard, the ink particles penetrate deeper into the structure and do not completely smooth out its micro-roughness. If the size of the printing element is smaller than the size of the cell on a raster roller, it falls into this cell and the ink is applied beyond the boundaries of the image. As a result, a spot of an arbitrary shape is formed on the print instead of a raster dot of a certain size, that is, the so-called "inverse tone transfer" occurs. We have measured the densitometric indicators of prints (optical density, gray balance), which significantly affect the quality of the product. Based on a Harrington's desirability function, the maximum permissible values of optical density, evenness of printing, contrast, dot gain of raster elements, and trapping, have been calculated. According to the generalized optimization criterion, a comprehensive index of the prints’ quality has been determined, which could ensure the predicted quality of a would-be run of the printed products, and would make it possible to adjust the printing process if necessary
flexographic printing; test print; cardboard; surface topography; densitometric quality indicators, UDC 655. 3.022+655.33.39, флексографическая печать; пробные оттиски; картон; топография поверхности; денситометрические показатели качества, флексографічний друк; пробні відбитки; картон; топографія поверхні; денситометричні показники якості
flexographic printing; test print; cardboard; surface topography; densitometric quality indicators, UDC 655. 3.022+655.33.39, флексографическая печать; пробные оттиски; картон; топография поверхности; денситометрические показатели качества, флексографічний друк; пробні відбитки; картон; топографія поверхні; денситометричні показники якості
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts