
doi: 10.5295/cdg.211490em
handle: 10486/712503 , 10810/61306
The objective of this study is to understand the role of the multidimensional trust of a luxury brand as an antecedent of consumer satisfaction and a consequence of reputation and familiarity, considering -in turn- that reputation and familiarity can be a consequence of the consumer’s cognitive and affective experiences. A cross-country analysis in the luxury retail sector was carried out. Association relationships between variables are tested by a model of structural equations. For this, a transnational analysis has been carried out in the luxury retail sector. A non-probabilistic sample was used in this study. 1058 people were interviewed, 608 consumers in Santiago (Chile) and 450 in Madrid (Spain). The key role played by the multidimensional trust of a luxury brand as an antecedent of satisfaction and consequence of reputation and familiarity is confirmed. When observing the reputation and familiarity of a luxury brand as a result of the cognitive and affective experiences of the consumer, differences between Chile and Spain have been discovered. Managers can not only use the brand’s own characteristics to differentiate themselves from the competition, but they can also do so through the multi-dimensional trust of the luxury brand.
Cross-cultural Analysis, análisis intercultural, Brand Luxury, Satisfaction, reputación, Trust, confianza, familiaridad, Economía, brand luxury, cross-cultural analysis, Reputation, familiarity, M31, Commerce, satisfaction, marca de lujo, satisfacción, trust, reputation, Familiarity, HF1-6182
Cross-cultural Analysis, análisis intercultural, Brand Luxury, Satisfaction, reputación, Trust, confianza, familiaridad, Economía, brand luxury, cross-cultural analysis, Reputation, familiarity, M31, Commerce, satisfaction, marca de lujo, satisfacción, trust, reputation, Familiarity, HF1-6182
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
