
doi: 10.1111/tops.12733
pmid: 38635667
handle: 11573/1724173 , 11568/1287828 , 11585/999296 , 10397/106697 , 11582/357088
doi: 10.1111/tops.12733
pmid: 38635667
handle: 11573/1724173 , 11568/1287828 , 11585/999296 , 10397/106697 , 11582/357088
Abstract According to the parallel architecture, syntactic and semantic information processing are two separate streams that interact selectively during language comprehension. While considerable effort is put into psycho‐ and neurolinguistics to understand the interchange of processing mechanisms in human comprehension, the nature of this interaction in recent neural Large Language Models remains elusive. In this article, we revisit influential linguistic and behavioral experiments and evaluate the ability of a large language model, GPT‐3, to perform these tasks. The model can solve semantic tasks autonomously from syntactic realization in a manner that resembles human behavior. However, the outcomes present a complex and variegated picture, leaving open the question of how Language Models could learn structured conceptual representations.
Syntax‐semantics interface, GPT‐3 prompting, 150, 610, Neural large language models; Statistical learning; Parallel architecture; Syntax-semantics interface; GPT-3 prompting; Enriched composition; Semantic composition, Neural large language model, Enriched composition; GPT-3 prompting; Neural large language models; Parallel architecture; Semantic composition; Statistical learning; Syntax-semantics interface, Parallel architecture, Semantic composition, Statistical learning, Syntax-semantics interface, Article, 004, 620, Enriched composition; GPT‐3 prompting; Neural large language models; Parallel architecture; Semantic composition; Statistical learning; Syntax‐semantics interface, Enriched composition, Neural large language models, GPT-3 prompting
Syntax‐semantics interface, GPT‐3 prompting, 150, 610, Neural large language models; Statistical learning; Parallel architecture; Syntax-semantics interface; GPT-3 prompting; Enriched composition; Semantic composition, Neural large language model, Enriched composition; GPT-3 prompting; Neural large language models; Parallel architecture; Semantic composition; Statistical learning; Syntax-semantics interface, Parallel architecture, Semantic composition, Statistical learning, Syntax-semantics interface, Article, 004, 620, Enriched composition; GPT‐3 prompting; Neural large language models; Parallel architecture; Semantic composition; Statistical learning; Syntax‐semantics interface, Enriched composition, Neural large language models, GPT-3 prompting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
