
Digital forensics is the process of identifying, preserving, analyzing, and documenting digital evidence for investigation purposes. Building or using file analysis tools is of great interest for a forensic expert to collect high-level information in a short time. In this paper, we consider the examination of files contained in digital media, especially files with possible incorrect types. This often reveals a simple way to hide sensitive content such as porn images, passwords, or accounts. Many commercial and free forensic tools are available for file type identification (FTI). In this work, we assess the performance of ten of them on two significant datasets and scenarios. The main issue we address is the relevance of the tools for forensic purposes. The underlying question is: do expectations meet reality? Our experiments highlight the significant disparity in the accuracy and behavior of the studied tools.
[INFO.INFO-CR]Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR], Benchmarking, Digital forensics, Comparative evaluation of forensics tools, Digital evidence assessment, File type identification, File systems, [INFO.INFO-CR] Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR]
[INFO.INFO-CR]Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR], Benchmarking, Digital forensics, Comparative evaluation of forensics tools, Digital evidence assessment, File type identification, File systems, [INFO.INFO-CR] Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
