
handle: 10397/89085
This article explores the capability of applying time-lapse ground penetrating radar (GPR) data to investigate the health condition of an urban subsurface. A workflow is proposed to semi-automatically extract changes from time-lapse GPR C-scans. The developed workflow consists of two main steps, in which the first step is image registration and intensity normalization. The workflow uses benchmark points on the ground to normalize the global intensity of time-lapse GPR C-scans. The second step classifies pixels into change or unchanged group. Two kinds of information are considered to construct two difference-maps: changes in the image intensity and the object structure. K-means clustering is responsible for extracting pixels that possess both intensity changes and object structure changes - where potential subsurface defects most likely occurred. The workflow was verified by a site experiment, and the area of excavation with pipe replacement was successfully identified. The performance of the proposed workflow was promising in excluding small and random scattering noise, which was the main challenge in a time-lapse GPR survey. The article serves as a prototype and demonstrates the feasibility and necessity of conducting temporal diagnosis on the subsurface structure.
temporal change detection, QC801-809, time-lapse, Geophysics. Cosmic physics, Ground penetrating radar (Gpr), Ground penetrating radar (GPR), subsurface diagnosis, Ocean engineering, Temporal change detection, Time-Lapse, Subsurface diagnosis, TC1501-1800
temporal change detection, QC801-809, time-lapse, Geophysics. Cosmic physics, Ground penetrating radar (Gpr), Ground penetrating radar (GPR), subsurface diagnosis, Ocean engineering, Temporal change detection, Time-Lapse, Subsurface diagnosis, TC1501-1800
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
