
AbstractHigh-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is important for diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) in inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) patients. However, visual ILD assessment via HRCT often has high inter-reader variability. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques for quantitative image analysis promise more accurate diagnostic and prognostic information. This study evaluated the reliability of artificial intelligence-based quantification of pulmonary HRCT (AIqpHRCT) in IRD-ILD patients and verified IRD-ILD quantification using AIqpHRCT in the clinical setting. Reproducibility of AIqpHRCT was verified for each typical HRCT pattern (ground-glass opacity [GGO], non-specific interstitial pneumonia [NSIP], usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP], granuloma). Additional, 50 HRCT datasets from 50 IRD-ILD patients using AIqpHRCT were analysed and correlated with clinical data and pulmonary lung function parameters. AIqpHRCT presented 100% agreement (coefficient of variation = 0.00%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 1.000) regarding the detection of the different HRCT pattern. Furthermore, AIqpHRCT data showed an increase of ILD from 10.7 ± 28.3% (median = 1.3%) in GGO to 18.9 ± 12.4% (median = 18.0%) in UIP pattern. The extent of fibrosis negatively correlated with FVC (ρ=-0.501), TLC (ρ=-0.622), and DLCO (ρ=-0.693) (p < 0.001). GGO measured by AIqpHRCT also significant negatively correlated with DLCO (ρ=-0.699), TLC (ρ=-0.580) and FVC (ρ=-0.423). For the first time, the study demonstrates that AIpqHRCT provides a highly reliable method for quantifying lung parenchymal changes in HRCT images of IRD-ILD patients. Further, the AIqpHRCT method revealed significant correlations between the extent of ILD and lung function parameters. This highlights the potential of AIpqHRCT in enhancing the accuracy of ILD diagnosis and prognosis in clinical settings, ultimately improving patient management and outcomes.
Male, Adult, Reproducibility of Results, Observational Research, Middle Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Rheumatic Diseases, Humans, Female, Female [MeSH] ; Rheumatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Rheumatic Diseases/complications [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Observational Research ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology [MeSH] ; Lung/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Artificial Intelligence [MeSH] ; Lung/physiopathology [MeSH] ; Artificial intelligence-based quantification of pulmonary ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed [MeSH] ; High-resolution computed tomography ; Male [MeSH] ; Reproducibility of Results [MeSH] ; Inflammatory rheumatic diseases ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology [MeSH] ; Interstitial lung disease ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Quantification, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung, Aged
Male, Adult, Reproducibility of Results, Observational Research, Middle Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Rheumatic Diseases, Humans, Female, Female [MeSH] ; Rheumatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Rheumatic Diseases/complications [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Observational Research ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology [MeSH] ; Lung/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Artificial Intelligence [MeSH] ; Lung/physiopathology [MeSH] ; Artificial intelligence-based quantification of pulmonary ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed [MeSH] ; High-resolution computed tomography ; Male [MeSH] ; Reproducibility of Results [MeSH] ; Inflammatory rheumatic diseases ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology [MeSH] ; Interstitial lung disease ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Quantification, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
