
pmid: 29637794
Background The 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on hypertension management recommend the introduction of antihypertensive treatment for patients with new stage 1 hypertension thresholds (130–139/80–89 mm Hg) and with a cardiovascular disease or related condition. We compared the Swiss population and economic impact of antihypertensive treatment of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines with the 2013 European guidelines. Methods Analyses were based on 4438 participants (aged 45–85 years; 2448 women) of the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study recruited between 2014-2017. Participants eligible for antihypertensive treatment according to the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2013 European guidelines were sex and age standardised using the Swiss population for 2016. In addition, we estimated the population-wide annual costs of antihypertensive treatment. Results Individuals eligible for antihypertensive treatment were 40.3% (95% confidence interval 38.5–42.1) and 31.3% (29.7–32.9) according to the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2013 European guidelines, respectively. That difference would translate into approximately 250,000 additional individuals eligible for antihypertensive treatment, corresponding to an additional annual cost of 72.5 million CHF (63.0 million EUR). Conclusion The 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on the management of hypertension substantially increase the number of individuals eligible for antihypertensive treatment compared to the 2013 European guidelines. While implementation of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines is expected to lead to cost reduction by preventing cardiovascular diseases, that reduction might be mitigated by the costs incurred by antihypertensive treatments in a larger proportion of the population.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Time Factors, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Patient Selection, Clinical Decision-Making, Blood Pressure, Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents/economics; Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use; Blood Pressure/drug effects; Clinical Decision-Making; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Female; Guideline Adherence/economics; Guideline Adherence/standards; Humans; Hypertension/drug therapy; Hypertension/economics; Hypertension/epidemiology; Hypertension/physiopathology; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards; Switzerland; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Hypertension; guidelines; prevention, Middle Aged, Drug Costs, Treatment Outcome, Hypertension, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Female, Guideline Adherence, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Antihypertensive Agents, Switzerland, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Time Factors, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Patient Selection, Clinical Decision-Making, Blood Pressure, Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents/economics; Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use; Blood Pressure/drug effects; Clinical Decision-Making; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Female; Guideline Adherence/economics; Guideline Adherence/standards; Humans; Hypertension/drug therapy; Hypertension/economics; Hypertension/epidemiology; Hypertension/physiopathology; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards; Switzerland; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Hypertension; guidelines; prevention, Middle Aged, Drug Costs, Treatment Outcome, Hypertension, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Female, Guideline Adherence, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Antihypertensive Agents, Switzerland, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
