
pmid: 40013497
A large number of mycotoxins and related fungal metabolites have not been assessed in terms of their toxicological impacts. Current methodologies often prioritize specific target families, neglecting the complexity and presence of co-occurring compounds. This work addresses a fundamental question: Can we assess molecular similarity and predict the toxicity of mycotoxins in silico using a defined set of molecular descriptors? We propose a rapid nontarget screening approach for multiple classes of mycotoxins, integrating both unsupervised and supervised machine learning models, alongside molecular and physicochemical descriptors to enhance the understanding of structural similarity, activity, and toxicity. Clustering analyses identify natural clusters corresponding to the known mycotoxin families, indicating that mycotoxins belonging to the same cluster share similar molecular properties. However, topological descriptors play a significant role in distinguishing between acutely toxic and nonacutely toxic compounds. Random forest (RF) and neural networks (NN), combined with molecular descriptors, contribute to improved knowledge and predictive capability regarding mycotoxin toxicity profiles. RF allows the prediction of toxicity using data reflecting mainly structural features and performs well in the presence of descriptors reflecting biological activity. NN models prove to be more sensitive to biological activity descriptors than RF. The use of descriptors encompassing structural complexity and diversity, chirality and symmetry, connectivity, atomic charge, and polarizability, together with descriptors representing lipophilicity, absorption, and permeation of molecules, is crucial for predicting toxicity, facilitating broader toxicological evaluations.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
