
Prior results demonstrated that the general visualization abstraction (GVA) algorithm can perform information abstraction (i.e., selection and grouping) and determine how information items should be presented (i.e., size) while lowering workload and improving situational awareness and task performance. This paper presents results from a within-subject evaluation to ascertain the relative strengths and weaknesses of the GVA algorithm's components and associated learning effects. The results corroborate the previous results and demonstrate that the GVA algorithm's underlying subcomponent structural composition is beneficial. Furthermore, these results indicate that usage of the GVA algorithm requires some learning before the benefits are achieved.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
