
doi: 10.1111/bjet.12950
handle: 10016/47071
Abstract Despite the success of academic advising dashboards in several higher educational institutions (HEI), these dashboards are still under‐explored in Latin American HEI's. To close this gap, three different Latin American universities adapted an existing advising dashboard, originally deployed at the KU Leuven to their own context. In all three cases, the context was the main ruling factor to these adaptations. In this paper, we describe these adaptions using a framework that focuses on four different elements of the context: Objectives, Stakeholders, Key moment and Interactions. Evaluation of the adapted dashboards in the three different Latin American universities is conducted through pilots. This evaluation shows the value of the dashboard approach in different contexts in terms of satisfaction, usefulness and impact in academic decision‐making and advising tasks. The main contribution of this paper is the systematic reporting of the adaptations to an academic advising dashboard and showing the value of an academic advising dashboard on academic decision‐making and advising tasks.
Telecomunicaciones, Academic advising, Educación, 1099 Other Technology, Case study, Social Sciences, Education & Educational Research, 1303 Specialist Studies in Education, Education, 1301 Education Systems, Information visualization, 3904 Specialist studies in education, Learning technologies, Learning analytics, Learning dashboard
Telecomunicaciones, Academic advising, Educación, 1099 Other Technology, Case study, Social Sciences, Education & Educational Research, 1303 Specialist Studies in Education, Education, 1301 Education Systems, Information visualization, 3904 Specialist studies in education, Learning technologies, Learning analytics, Learning dashboard
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
