
doi: 10.1002/wics.70005
ABSTRACTGeneralized linear latent variable models (GLLVMs) have become mainstream models in this analysis of correlated, m‐dimensional data. GLLVMs can be seen as a reduced‐rank version of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) as the latent variables which are of dimension induce a reduced‐rank covariance structure for the model. Models are flexible and can be used for various purposes, including exploratory analysis, that is, ordination analysis, estimating patterns of residual correlation, multivariate inference about measured predictors, and prediction. Recent advances in computational tools allow the development of efficient, scalable algorithms for fitting GLLMVs for any response distribution. In this article, we discuss the basics of GLLVMs and review some options for model fitting. We focus on methods that are based on likelihood inference. The implementations available in R are compared via simulation studies and an example illustrates how GLLVMs can be applied as an exploratory tool in the analysis of data from community ecology.
todennäköisyyslaskenta, MCMC, Statistics, School of Resource Wisdom, factor analysis, Gauss-Hermite, quasi-likelihood, Gauss–Hermite, Resurssiviisausyhteisö, faktorianalyysi, likelihood function, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Laplace approximation, Tilastotiede
todennäköisyyslaskenta, MCMC, Statistics, School of Resource Wisdom, factor analysis, Gauss-Hermite, quasi-likelihood, Gauss–Hermite, Resurssiviisausyhteisö, faktorianalyysi, likelihood function, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Laplace approximation, Tilastotiede
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
