
pmid: 32419713
pmc: PMC7225691
AbstractStudy objectiveWe aimed to describe the preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic in referral EDs caring for children across Europe.MethodsWe did a cross-sectional point prevalence survey, which was developed and disseminated through the pediatric emergency medicine research networks for Europe (REPEM) and the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI). We included a pre-determined number of centers based on each country population: five to ten EDs for countries with > 20 million inhabitants and one to five EDs for the other countries. ED directors or named delegates completed the survey between March 20th and 21st to report practice in use one month after the outbreak in Northern Italy. We used descriptive statistics to analyse data.ResultsOverall 102 centers from 18 countries completed the survey: 34% did not have an ED contingency plan for pandemics and 36% had never had simulations for such events. Wide variation on PPE items was shown for recommended PPE use at pre-triage and for patient assessment, with 62% of centers experiencing shortage in one or more PPE items. COVID-19 positive ED staff was reported in 25% of centers. Only 17% of EDs had negative pressure isolation rooms.ConclusionWe identified variability and gaps in preparedness and response to the COVID-19 epidemic across European referral EDs for children. Early availability of a documented contingency plan, provision of simulation training, appropriate use of PPE, and appropriate isolation facilities emerged as key factors that should be optimized to improve preparedness and inform responses to future pandemics.
EMC MM-04-54-08-A, Pneumonia, Viral, 610, Ireland/epidemiology, Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis, Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis/epidemiology/therapy, Europe/epidemiology, 618, Patient Isolation, Betacoronavirus, Country Leads, Prevalence, Humans, Child, Pandemics, Personal Protective Equipment, Emergency Service, Infection Control, Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis, United Kingdom/epidemiology, SARS-CoV-2, Hospital/organization & administration/standards/statistics & numerical data, COVID-19, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Pneumonia, Emergency & Critical Care Medicine, 300, Europe, Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration, Health Care Surveys, Emergency Medicine, Critical Pathways, Infection Control/standards, Triage/standards, Pediatrics/Original Research, Viral/diagnosis/epidemiology/therapy, Triage, Coronavirus Infections, Emergency Service, Hospital, Ireland, Facilities and Services Utilization, ddc: ddc:618
EMC MM-04-54-08-A, Pneumonia, Viral, 610, Ireland/epidemiology, Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis, Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis/epidemiology/therapy, Europe/epidemiology, 618, Patient Isolation, Betacoronavirus, Country Leads, Prevalence, Humans, Child, Pandemics, Personal Protective Equipment, Emergency Service, Infection Control, Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis, United Kingdom/epidemiology, SARS-CoV-2, Hospital/organization & administration/standards/statistics & numerical data, COVID-19, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Pneumonia, Emergency & Critical Care Medicine, 300, Europe, Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration, Health Care Surveys, Emergency Medicine, Critical Pathways, Infection Control/standards, Triage/standards, Pediatrics/Original Research, Viral/diagnosis/epidemiology/therapy, Triage, Coronavirus Infections, Emergency Service, Hospital, Ireland, Facilities and Services Utilization, ddc: ddc:618
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 70 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
