
Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major threat to patients. To date, data on risk factors have been limited, with low internal and external validity. In this multicentre study, risk factors for CRE BSI were determined by comparison with two control groups: patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) BSI, and patients without Enterobacterales infection (uninfected patients). Methods A multicentre, case-control-control study was nested in a European prospective cohort study on CRE (EURECA). CRE BSI:CSE BSI matching was 1:1, CRE BSI:Uninfected patients matching was 1:3, based on hospital, ward and length of stay. Conditional logistic regression was applied. Results From March 2016 to November 2018, 73 CRE BSIs, 73 CSE BSIs and 219 uninfected patients were included from 18 European hospitals. For CRE versus CSE BSI, previous CRE colonization/infection [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 7.32; 95% CI 1.65–32.38) increased the risk. For CRE versus uninfected controls, independent risk factors included: older age (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.06), patient referral (long-term care facility: IRR 7.19; 95% CI 1.51–34.24; acute care hospital: IRR 5.26; 95% CI 1.61–17.11), previous colonization/infection with other MDR organisms (MDROs) (IRR 9.71; 95% CI 2.33–40.56), haemodialysis (IRR 8.59; 95% CI 1.82–40.53), invasive procedures (IRR 5.66; 95% CI 2.11–15.16), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (IRR 3.92; 95% CI 1.68–9.13) or third/fourth generation cephalosporin (IRR 2.75; 95% CI 1.06–7.11) exposure within 3 months before enrolment. Conclusions Evidence of previous CRE colonization/infection was a major risk factor for carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales BSI. Compared with uninfected patients, evidence of previous MDRO colonization/infection and healthcare exposure were important risk factors for CRE BSI. Targeted screening, infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship should focus on these high-risk patients.
Microbiology (medical), Male, Enterobacteriaceae Infections / microbiology, Bacteremia, Carbapenems / pharmacology, Bacteremia / epidemiology, carbepenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Risk Factors, 616, Journal Article, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Prospective Studies, Enterobacteriaceae Infections / epidemiology, Biology, carbepenem resistant, Original Research, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use, Pharmacology, Aged, 80 and over, Pharmacology. Therapy, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae / isolation & purification, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Middle Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Europe, Infectious Diseases, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Carbapenems, bloodstream infections; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Case-Control Studies, Bacteremia / microbiology, Female, Europe / epidemiology, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae / drug effects
Microbiology (medical), Male, Enterobacteriaceae Infections / microbiology, Bacteremia, Carbapenems / pharmacology, Bacteremia / epidemiology, carbepenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Risk Factors, 616, Journal Article, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Prospective Studies, Enterobacteriaceae Infections / epidemiology, Biology, carbepenem resistant, Original Research, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use, Pharmacology, Aged, 80 and over, Pharmacology. Therapy, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae / isolation & purification, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Middle Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Europe, Infectious Diseases, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Carbapenems, bloodstream infections; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Case-Control Studies, Bacteremia / microbiology, Female, Europe / epidemiology, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae / drug effects
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
