Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Handwritten Signature Verification via Deep Sparse Coding Architecture

Authors: Dimitros Tsourounis; Ilias Theodorakopoulos; Elias N. Zois; George Economou; Spiros Fotopoulos;

Handwritten Signature Verification via Deep Sparse Coding Architecture

Abstract

The use of a person's signature is considered as one of the most commonly used biometric methods for recognition, either as a standalone feature or as part of multimodal systems. Based on the inter-writer variability, handwritten signatures have been accepted as a personal trait in many transactions to verify the consent or the author's presence. The main challenges for handwritten signature verification are the limited amount of available data for each writer and the intra-writer variability. Sparse Representation (i.e. dictionary learning and sparse coding) achieved state of the art results at handwritten signature verification, using only a small set of genuine reference samples of the writer. The extension of Sparse Representation to an efficient multi-layer architecture is Deep Sparse Coding. Deep Sparse Coding architecture connects multiple layers of Sparse Representation with a sparse-to-dense module in order to enable Sparse Coding on deeper layers. Learning sparse representations at different levels of abstraction leads to building feature hierarchies. The sparse-to-dense module involves a Dimensionality Reduction process, which was implemented with simple and fast methods, such as Random Orthogonal projection or PCA; instead of the computational expensive DrLIM. The performance of the proposed Deep Sparse Coding architecture to the challenging problem of offline signature verification is demonstrated in the popular CEDAR signature dataset, delivering improved state of the art results.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!