
AbstractThe influence of hydrodynamic conditions in dual‐impeller crystallizers at different impeller spacings on nucleation kinetics was investigated. Dual‐pitched‐blade turbine (2 PBT) and dual‐straight‐blade turbine (2 SBT) impeller configurations were used. To analyze hydrodynamic conditions at different impeller spacings, a computational fluid dynamics model was developed and validated by experimentally determining mixing time and power input. Results show that nucleation kinetics in the 2 SBT impeller system is affected by the characteristic microscale parameters. The same was not observed in the 2 PBT impeller system. Also, as a consequence of higher shear stress values, smaller but less agglomerated crystals were obtained in 2 SBT impeller systems.
Computational fluid dynamics modeling, Mixing, Mixing time, Dual-impeller crystallizer, Crystallization, Computational fluid dynamics modeling ; Crystallization ; Dual-impeller crystallizer ; Mixing ; Mixing time
Computational fluid dynamics modeling, Mixing, Mixing time, Dual-impeller crystallizer, Crystallization, Computational fluid dynamics modeling ; Crystallization ; Dual-impeller crystallizer ; Mixing ; Mixing time
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
