
AbstractPurposeThis study aims to attain metric data of the velopharyngeal dimensions of healthy subjects as well as patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency using the example of cleft and lip palate (CLP) in order to determine possible differences in the volumes of both groups.MethodsVolumes and distances of velopharyngeal areas were analyzed retrospectively using cone beam computed tomography data sets (n = 60). Group 1 included healthy patients receiving dental implants (n = 31). Group 2 was represented by patients with surgically closed cleft lip and palate (n = 29).ResultsBiggest differences among mean values of both groups were found for: minimum axial area (p = 0.000), airway area caudal (p = 0.000), distance between posterior nasal spine and posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) (p = 0.014), mean distance between velum and PPW (p = 0.000), length of PPW (p = 0.000) and length of anterior pharyngeal wall (p = 0.000).ConclusionDifferences in the shape and geometry of the velopharyngeal area in subjects with a regular velopharyngeal structure and function and patients with cleft palate do exist. The significant differences found here can be categorized into two groups: one reflects distances between the anterior and posterior pharynx, presenting longer distances for patients with CLP. The second significant difference regards values of length in cranio-caudal direction, which is longer in healthy subjects. With regards to these values, one could conclude, that even though total volumes of both groups did not differ in size, group 1 shows three-dimensional velopharyngeal shapes that are longer and narrower, whereas shapes of patients of group 2 tend to be wider and shorter in general.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Velopharyngeal Insufficiency, Adolescent, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Middle Aged, Healthy Volunteers, Cleft Palate, Young Adult, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Humans, Pharynx, Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Velopharyngeal dimensions ; Cleft Palate/surgery [MeSH] ; Velopharynx ; Original Article ; Male [MeSH] ; Cleft Palate/complications [MeSH] ; Cleft palate ; Healthy Volunteers [MeSH] ; Child [MeSH] ; Palate, Soft/anatomy ; Postoperative Period [MeSH] ; Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Cone beam computed tomography ; Humans [MeSH] ; Palate, Soft/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Retrospective Studies [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Pharynx/anatomy ; Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/etiology [MeSH] ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography [MeSH] ; Pharynx/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Young Adult [MeSH] ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional [MeSH], Original Article, Female, Postoperative Period, Palate, Soft, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Velopharyngeal Insufficiency, Adolescent, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Middle Aged, Healthy Volunteers, Cleft Palate, Young Adult, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Humans, Pharynx, Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Velopharyngeal dimensions ; Cleft Palate/surgery [MeSH] ; Velopharynx ; Original Article ; Male [MeSH] ; Cleft Palate/complications [MeSH] ; Cleft palate ; Healthy Volunteers [MeSH] ; Child [MeSH] ; Palate, Soft/anatomy ; Postoperative Period [MeSH] ; Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Cone beam computed tomography ; Humans [MeSH] ; Palate, Soft/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Retrospective Studies [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Pharynx/anatomy ; Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/etiology [MeSH] ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography [MeSH] ; Pharynx/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Young Adult [MeSH] ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional [MeSH], Original Article, Female, Postoperative Period, Palate, Soft, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
