
A verification method proposed by \textit{K. Nagatou}, \textit{N. Yamamoto} and \textit{M. T. Nakao} [An approach to the numerical verification of solutions for nonlinear elliptic problems with local uniqueness. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 20, No. 5-6, 543-565 (1959)] in the context of nonlinear boundary value problems, is extended to elliptic eigenvalue problems \(-\Delta u+ qu=\lambda u\) in \(\Omega\), \(u=0\) on \(\partial\Omega\) under the normalization \(\int_\Omega u^2dx= 1\). Here, \(\Delta\) denotes the Laplace operator on a bounded convex domain \(\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^2\). Using accurate finite element approximations to eigensolutions \((u,\lambda)\in H^1_0(\Omega)\times \mathbb{R}\) together with certain a posteriori estimates, Banach's fixed point theorem can be applied, provided that some verification condition is satisfied. In this way the author obtains inclusion sets for locally unique solutions \((u,\lambda)\) and separately for \(\lambda\) as well. Two examples are treated and numerical results are presented.
Numerical methods for eigenvalue problems for boundary value problems involving PDEs, finite element, verification method, Algorithms with automatic result verification, Estimates of eigenvalues in context of PDEs, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, elliptic eigenvalue problems, numerical results, inclusion sets
Numerical methods for eigenvalue problems for boundary value problems involving PDEs, finite element, verification method, Algorithms with automatic result verification, Estimates of eigenvalues in context of PDEs, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, elliptic eigenvalue problems, numerical results, inclusion sets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
