
doi: 10.3397/in_2024_1468
Recording of acoustic emissions (elastic waves emitted by dislocation motion) during compression of microscopic samples is a novel emerging tool for the investigation of mechanical properties of materials. Yet the resulting signals can be so noisy and complex that they don't easily allow for identifying the deformation mode or the material involved. This study aims at testing if the human auditory system can pick patterns in the audified recordings (i.e. transposed from the ultrasonic to the audible range) that match the physical characteristics of the samples. In a Free Sorting Task, participants sorted sounds into groups according to perceived similarity. The sounds originated in recordings varying according to material, deformation mode, and size of the sample. During clustering and multidimensional analysis, sounds were found to be first grouped according to spectral features: Zinc and Magnesium recordings respectively produced high-pitched and low-pitched sounds. Sounds were further discriminated according to perceived sound level (soft vs. loud for slipping vs. twinning) and number of perceived sound events (no clearly associated physical parameter). Correlations were found between subjective groupings and audio descriptors, so that audio-inspired mechanical investigations can now be envisioned.
[SPI] Engineering Sciences [physics], [PHYS.MECA.ACOU] Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Acoustics [physics.class-ph]
[SPI] Engineering Sciences [physics], [PHYS.MECA.ACOU] Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Acoustics [physics.class-ph]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
