
doi: 10.1007/bf01205293
The main result of the present paper by Markus and Matsaev can roughly be formulated as follows: Let \(L(x)\) be a smooth, operator valued function on \([0,1]\), selfadjoint and satisfying the following two conditions: \[ L(0)\ll 0, \quad L(1)\gg 1; \qquad (L(x)f,f)\delta \| f\|^ 2, \] for some positive constants \(\varepsilon\), \(\delta\) and any vector \(f\). Then there is a factorization \(L(x)=M(x)(Z-x)\) with \(M(x)\) a smooth and everywhere invertible operator- valued function and with \(Z\) similar to a selfadjoint operator with spectrum contained in the interval \([0,1]\). This result improves a recent similar result of the both authors. All previously known results along the same lines were proved for analytic functions in \(x\). The strength and novelty of the present approach consists in renouncing to the analyticity condition and by replacing it in the proofs with pseudoanalytic extensions of the function \(L\) to the complex plane.
similar to a selfadjoint operator, selfadjoint nonanalytic operator function, Factorization theory (including Wiener-Hopf and spectral factorizations) of linear operators, single spectral zone, linearization, pseudoanalytic extensions, smooth and everywhere invertible operator-valued function, Functions whose values are linear operators (operator- and matrix-valued functions, etc., including analytic and meromorphic ones)
similar to a selfadjoint operator, selfadjoint nonanalytic operator function, Factorization theory (including Wiener-Hopf and spectral factorizations) of linear operators, single spectral zone, linearization, pseudoanalytic extensions, smooth and everywhere invertible operator-valued function, Functions whose values are linear operators (operator- and matrix-valued functions, etc., including analytic and meromorphic ones)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
