
Characteristic patterns in amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) develop with gestational age (GA), and so can be used to evaluate brain maturation in premature infants. Reference aEEG values in normal preterm infants have not been identified and data are scarce. We aimed to validate a currently available aEEG scoring system. We also investigated the development of aEEG activity during the first week after birth, determining reference values in preterm infants with no abnormal cranial ultrasound findings. We prospectively studied aEEG and cranial ultrasounds in infants with a GA of < 35 weeks. We conducted aEEG at 12-14 hours, 46-48 hours, 70-72 hours, and 1 week after birth. The aEEG recordings were evaluated using Burdjalov criteria, scored by two independent neonatologists. Thirty-four infants were enrolled and completed the 1-week evaluation. GA ranged from 24 to 35 weeks and birth weights varied between 570 and 2,100 g. We analyzed 134 aEEG tracings, with a mean difference between raters of -0.05. Total scores, summed from scores for each assessed variable, increased gradually with advancing gestational and postnatal age. However, highest scores were not attained until 35 weeks' gestational age. There was high inter-rater agreement for aEEG scoring, and we could ascertain some approximate reference values for aEEG development in preterm infants at varying GA. To establish standardized aEEG reference criteria, further studies in larger cohorts of premature infants should be performed over longer periods.
cerebral function monitor, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, reference values, Pediatrics, RJ1-570, preterm infant
cerebral function monitor, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, reference values, Pediatrics, RJ1-570, preterm infant
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
