
As mobile devices are nowadays used regularly and everywhere, their energy consumption has become a central concern. However, today's mobile applications often do not consider energy requirements and users lack information on their energy consumption before they install and try them. In this paper, we compare mobile applications from two domains and show that they reveal different energy consumption while providing similar services. We define microbenchmarks for emailing and web browsing and evaluate apps from these domains. We show that non-functional features such as web page caching can but not have to have a positive influence on an application's energy consumption.
ddc:004, Android, Energie-Benchmarking, Grüne Mobile Anwendungen, Android, Energy Benchmarking, Greenness of Mobile Apps, Measurement, Performance, Debugging, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/004
ddc:004, Android, Energie-Benchmarking, Grüne Mobile Anwendungen, Android, Energy Benchmarking, Greenness of Mobile Apps, Measurement, Performance, Debugging, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
