
In the context of the present and future Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments, going beyond the information provided by the power spectrum has become necessary in order to tightly constrain the cosmological model. The non-Gaussian signatures in the CMB represent a very promising tool to probe the early universe and the structure formation epoch. We present the results of a comparison between two families of non-Gaussian estimators: The first act on the wavelet space (skewness and excess kurtosis of the wavelet coefficients) and the second group on the Fourier space (bi- and trispectrum). We compare the relative sensitivities of these estimators by applying them to three different data sets meant to reproduce the majority of possible non-Gaussian contributions to the CMB. We find that the skewness in the wavelet space is slightly more sensitive than the bispectrum. For the four point estimators, we find that the excess kurtosis of the wavelet coefficients has very similar capabilities than the diagonal trispectrum while a near-diagonal trispectrum seems to be less sensitive to non-Gaussian signatures.
21 pages, 17 figures. Submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysics. A version with full resolution figures can be found at http://astronomy.sussex.ac.uk/~martink/papers/wav-four.ps.gz
cosmic microwave background, data analysis, Astrophysics (astro-ph), Gaussian processes, Fourier methods, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, Astrophysical cosmology, [PHYS.ASTR.CO] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]/Cosmology and Extra-Galactic Astrophysics [astro-ph.CO], non-Gaussianity, cosmology, Harmonic analysis on Euclidean spaces
cosmic microwave background, data analysis, Astrophysics (astro-ph), Gaussian processes, Fourier methods, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics, Astrophysical cosmology, [PHYS.ASTR.CO] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]/Cosmology and Extra-Galactic Astrophysics [astro-ph.CO], non-Gaussianity, cosmology, Harmonic analysis on Euclidean spaces
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
