
pmid: 25616846
Miniplates and reconstruction plates are usually used to fix a fibular free flap, the gold standard in reconstruction of large segmental mandibular defects. Though biodegradable plates are used in orthognathic operations and repair of fractures nowadays, we know of no studies of the use of biodegradable plates in the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects including a fibular free flap. We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients who had reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects with fibular free flaps during the past 10 years, and recorded clinical data and morbidity. We compared patients who had reconstruction of such defects with fibular free flaps and miniplates (n=26) with those in whom biodegradable plates had been used (n=21). There was no significant difference between miniplates and biodegradable plates with regard to overall complications (p=0.45) and failure of flaps (p=0.59). After confounding factors had been adjusted for with Cox's proportional hazards regression, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who developed a complication between the two groups (p=0.4). The type of plate does not seem to affect overall morbidity in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Polyesters, 610, Biocompatible Materials, Mandible, Free Tissue Flaps/transplantation*, Mandibular Reconstruction/methods, Miniplate, Free Tissue Flaps, Mandibular Neoplasms/surgery, Mandibular Reconstruction/instrumentation*, Young Adult, Postoperative Complications, Transplant Donor Site/surgery, Absorbable Implants, Humans, Bone Plates*, Fibula/surgery, Absorbable Implants*, Bone Transplantation/methods, Biocompatible Materials/chemistry, Bone Transplantation/instrumentation*, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Free fibular flap, Polyesters/chemistry, Bone Transplantation, Miniaturization, Graft Survival, Surgical Wound Dehiscence/etiology, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Fixation, Titanium/chemistry, Mandibular Neoplasms, Fibula, Female, Reconstruction, Mandibular Reconstruction, Biodegradable plate, Bone Plates, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Polyesters, 610, Biocompatible Materials, Mandible, Free Tissue Flaps/transplantation*, Mandibular Reconstruction/methods, Miniplate, Free Tissue Flaps, Mandibular Neoplasms/surgery, Mandibular Reconstruction/instrumentation*, Young Adult, Postoperative Complications, Transplant Donor Site/surgery, Absorbable Implants, Humans, Bone Plates*, Fibula/surgery, Absorbable Implants*, Bone Transplantation/methods, Biocompatible Materials/chemistry, Bone Transplantation/instrumentation*, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Free fibular flap, Polyesters/chemistry, Bone Transplantation, Miniaturization, Graft Survival, Surgical Wound Dehiscence/etiology, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Fixation, Titanium/chemistry, Mandibular Neoplasms, Fibula, Female, Reconstruction, Mandibular Reconstruction, Biodegradable plate, Bone Plates, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
