
The main purpose of the study is to investigate students’ views about the implementation of collaborative learning in English classes. Collaborative learning helps students to improve their English language performance. To achieve this objective, observation and questionnaires were employed. The quantitative data were analyzed using percentage and frequency. Theme analysis technique was used to analyze the qualitative data. The result of the study indicated that most students’ applied collaborative learning, but the type of collaborative learning they are applying is not collaborative learning. Most of the teachers simply make their students to sit side by side to talk with each other as they do their individual assignments, and some teachers assign a task to groups. Then, one or two of the group members do the work and the other group members get equal credit. Although each of these is important in collaborative learning, they do not qualify collaborative learning rather traditional group learning. In addition to this, some students were not playing their roles as they are expected. Teachers and other concerned bodies ought to deliver sorts of orientations to the students about the importance of collaborative learning to maximize students’ views before implementing collaborative learning.
Theme (computing), Social Sciences, Theory and practice of education, Cooperative learning, Cooperative Learning, Education, Systems engineering, Task (project management), Engineering, Teacher Perceptions, восприятие, Teaching method, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychology, Team learning, L7-991, LB5-3640, LC8-6691, акăлчан чĕлхи, Collaborative Learning, Pedagogy, Educational Technology, Education (General), Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Research, Special aspects of education, Computer science, пĕрле вĕренни, Mathematics education, Collaborative learning, FOS: Psychology, World Wide Web, Online Learning, Group work, Implementation, Perception, Open learning, E-Learning in Higher Education
Theme (computing), Social Sciences, Theory and practice of education, Cooperative learning, Cooperative Learning, Education, Systems engineering, Task (project management), Engineering, Teacher Perceptions, восприятие, Teaching method, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychology, Team learning, L7-991, LB5-3640, LC8-6691, акăлчан чĕлхи, Collaborative Learning, Pedagogy, Educational Technology, Education (General), Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Research, Special aspects of education, Computer science, пĕрле вĕренни, Mathematics education, Collaborative learning, FOS: Psychology, World Wide Web, Online Learning, Group work, Implementation, Perception, Open learning, E-Learning in Higher Education
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
