
pmid: 37950859
pmc: PMC10849343
Abstract Background and Aims Physical inactivity, sedentary behaviour (SB), and inadequate sleep are key behavioural risk factors of cardiometabolic diseases. Each behaviour is mainly considered in isolation, despite clear behavioural and biological interdependencies. The aim of this study was to investigate associations of five-part movement compositions with adiposity and cardiometabolic biomarkers. Methods Cross-sectional data from six studies (n = 15 253 participants; five countries) from the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep consortium were analysed. Device-measured time spent in sleep, SB, standing, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) made up the composition. Outcomes included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, HDL cholesterol, total:HDL cholesterol ratio, triglycerides, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Compositional linear regression examined associations between compositions and outcomes, including modelling time reallocation between behaviours. Results The average daily composition of the sample (age: 53.7 ± 9.7 years; 54.7% female) was 7.7 h sleeping, 10.4 h sedentary, 3.1 h standing, 1.5 h LIPA, and 1.3 h MVPA. A greater MVPA proportion and smaller SB proportion were associated with better outcomes. Reallocating time from SB, standing, LIPA, or sleep into MVPA resulted in better scores across all outcomes. For example, replacing 30 min of SB, sleep, standing, or LIPA with MVPA was associated with −0.63 (95% confidence interval −0.48, −0.79), −0.43 (−0.25, −0.59), −0.40 (−0.25, −0.56), and −0.15 (0.05, −0.34) kg/m2 lower BMI, respectively. Greater relative standing time was beneficial, whereas sleep had a detrimental association when replacing LIPA/MVPA and positive association when replacing SB. The minimal displacement of any behaviour into MVPA for improved cardiometabolic health ranged from 3.8 (HbA1c) to 12.7 (triglycerides) min/day. Conclusions Compositional data analyses revealed a distinct hierarchy of behaviours. Moderate-vigorous physical activity demonstrated the strongest, most time-efficient protective associations with cardiometabolic outcomes. Theoretical benefits from reallocating SB into sleep, standing, or LIPA required substantial changes in daily activity.
Adult, Male, cohort consortium, 610, physical activity, Medical Biosciences - Radboud University Medical Center, Clinical Research, sedentary behaviour, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Prospective Studies, sleep, ta315, Exercise, Triglycerides, Glycated Hemoglobin, Sitting Position, Physical activity, compositional data analysis, Cohort consortium, Cholesterol, HDL, Compositional data analysis, 600, Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa och socialmedicin, Sedentary behaviour, ta3121, Middle Aged, Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine, Cardiometabolic outcomes, Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cardiovascular Diseases, cardiometabolic outcomes, Female, standing, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sleep, Standing
Adult, Male, cohort consortium, 610, physical activity, Medical Biosciences - Radboud University Medical Center, Clinical Research, sedentary behaviour, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Prospective Studies, sleep, ta315, Exercise, Triglycerides, Glycated Hemoglobin, Sitting Position, Physical activity, compositional data analysis, Cohort consortium, Cholesterol, HDL, Compositional data analysis, 600, Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa och socialmedicin, Sedentary behaviour, ta3121, Middle Aged, Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine, Cardiometabolic outcomes, Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cardiovascular Diseases, cardiometabolic outcomes, Female, standing, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sleep, Standing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 87 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
