
Chatbot research has advanced significantly over the years. Enterprises have been investigating how to improve these tools’ performance, adoption, and implementation to communicate with customers or internal teams through social media. Besides, businesses also want to pay attention to quality reviews from customers via social networks about products available in the market. From there, please select a new method to improve the service quality of their products and then send it to publishing agencies to publish based on the needs and evaluation of society. Although there have been numerous recent studies, not all of them address the issue of opinion evaluation on the chatbot system. The primary goal of this paper’s research is to evaluate human comments in English via the chatbot system. The system’s documents are preprocessed and opinion-matched to provide opinion judgments based on English comments. Based on practical needs and social conditions, this methodology aims to evolve chatbot content based on user inter-actions, allowing for a cyclic and human-supervised process with the following steps to evaluate comments in English. First, we preprocess the input data by collecting social media comments, and then our system parses those comments according to the rating views for each topic covered. Finally, our system will give a rating and comment result for each comment entered into the system. Experiments show that our method can improve accuracy better than the referenced methods by 78.53%.
Artificial intelligence, Knowledge management, FOS: Political science, offensive comments, FOS: Law, Epistemology, Data science, behavioral culture, Social media, FOS: Economics and business, Sentiment analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Advertising, Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis, Service (business), Sentiment Analysis, Business, ontology, Political science, online, Publishing, Marketing, chatbot, QA75.5-76.95, Computer science, Process (computing), FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Automatic Keyword Extraction from Textual Data, World Wide Web, Philosophy, Operating system, Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Chatbots, sentiment analysis, Electronic computers. Computer science, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Artificial Intelligence in Service Industry, opinion mining, Quality (philosophy), Publication, Law, Chatbot
Artificial intelligence, Knowledge management, FOS: Political science, offensive comments, FOS: Law, Epistemology, Data science, behavioral culture, Social media, FOS: Economics and business, Sentiment analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Advertising, Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis, Service (business), Sentiment Analysis, Business, ontology, Political science, online, Publishing, Marketing, chatbot, QA75.5-76.95, Computer science, Process (computing), FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Automatic Keyword Extraction from Textual Data, World Wide Web, Philosophy, Operating system, Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Chatbots, sentiment analysis, Electronic computers. Computer science, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Artificial Intelligence in Service Industry, opinion mining, Quality (philosophy), Publication, Law, Chatbot
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
