Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YUHSpace (Yonsei Uni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Characteristics of combined hepatocelluar-cholangiocarcinoma and comparison with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: S H, Kim; Y N, Park; J H, Lim; G H, Choi; J S, Choi; K S, Kim;

Characteristics of combined hepatocelluar-cholangiocarcinoma and comparison with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract

The 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) currently classifies combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) into one category. Study outcomes comparing the two carcinomas have shown contrary results. This study was designed to compare the survival and prognostic factors of both carcinomas.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 107 patients with cHCC-CC or ICC who underwent liver resection between January 2000 and December 2009.Thirty patients (28%) were diagnosed with cHCC-CC, and 77 patients (72%) had ICC. Disease-free survival (DFS) was poorer in the cHCC-CC patients (six months), and the overall survival (OS) durations were similar (p = 0.477) between cHCC-CC (58 months) and ICC (45 months) patients. A tumor size larger than 5 cm, vascular invasion and lymph node (LN) metastasis were prognostic factors in all patients. However, tumor size and LN metastasis in cHCC-CC patients and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, differentiation and LN metastasis in ICC patients were found to be independent prognostic factors.Patients with cHCC-CC showed poorer DFS and similar OS rates compared to those with ICC. Our study revealed different prognostic factors in cHCC-CC. To understand more accurately cHCC-CC's prognosis, difference of genetic characteristics and tumor biology should be further evaluated.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Hepatocellular/mortality*, Adult, Male, Cholangiocarcinoma/diagnosis*, Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality*, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology, 610, Hepatocellular/diagnosis*, Liver Neoplasms/mortality*, Disease-Free Survival, Medical Records, Liver Neoplasms/surgery, Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology, Risk Factors, Republic of Korea, 617, Hepatectomy, Humans, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Intrahepatic, Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery, Carcinoma, Liver Neoplasms, Liver Neoplasms/pathology, Tumor size, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Hepatocellular/surgery, Sample Size, Lymphatic Metastasis, Female, Bile Ducts, Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis*, Republic of Korea/epidemiology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    59
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
59
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green