
handle: 10630/23914
In an attempt to speed up the solution of the unit commitment (UC) problem, both machine-learning and optimization-based methods have been proposed to lighten the full UC formulation by removing as many superfluous line-flow constraints as possible. While the elimination strategies based on machine learning are fast and typically delete more constraints, they may be over-optimistic and result in infeasible UC solutions. For their part, optimization-based methods seek to identify redundant constraints in the full UC formulation by exploring the feasibility region of an LP-relaxation. In doing so, these methods only get rid of line-flow constraints whose removal leaves the feasibility region of the original UC problem unchanged. In this paper, we propose a procedure to substantially increase the line-flow constraints that are filtered out by optimization-based methods without jeopardizing their appealing ability of preserving feasibility. Our approach is based on tightening the LP-relaxation that the optimization-based method uses with a valid inequality related to the objective function of the UC problem and hence, of an economic nature. The result is that the so strengthened optimization-based method identifies not only redundant line-flow constraints but also inactive ones, thus leading to more reduced UC formulations.
10 pages
330, Optimización combinatoria, Circuitos de interfaces, Unit commitment, Optimization and Control (math.OC), Ingeniería - Estimación de costes, Energía - Consumo, Optimization-based method, Circuitos lógicos, FOS: Mathematics, Bounding, Mathematics - Optimization and Control, Constraint screening, Cost-driven approach
330, Optimización combinatoria, Circuitos de interfaces, Unit commitment, Optimization and Control (math.OC), Ingeniería - Estimación de costes, Energía - Consumo, Optimization-based method, Circuitos lógicos, FOS: Mathematics, Bounding, Mathematics - Optimization and Control, Constraint screening, Cost-driven approach
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
