
We quantify the impact of technological innovation factors on university patent transferability, accurately identify transferable patents, and address the lack of interpretability in existing patent transferability models. Firsly, we apply the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model to conduct text mining and feature extraction on abstracts of university patents in the field of artificial intelligence to obtain the technological innovation features of university patents. We then construct a patent transferability fusion index system that includes technological innovation features and quality features. Four typical machine learning algorithms, namely support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) are used to predict university patent transferability. We use SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to explore feature importance and interactions based on the model with the strongest performance. Our results show that (1) XGBoost outperforms the other algorithms in predicting university patent transferability; (2) fusion indicators can effectively improve prediction performance with respect to university patent transferability; (3) the importance of technological innovation features generated with XGBoost is generally high; and (4) the impact of both technology innovation and patent quality features on university patent transferability is nonlinear and there are significant positive interaction effects between them.
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, LDA, technological innovation, SHAP, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, patent transferability, TK1-9971
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, LDA, technological innovation, SHAP, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, patent transferability, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
