
AbstractBuilding on theories of sensemaking, this study demonstrates the importance of disentangling the creative process. Specifically, we show that the specific elements of the creative process (problem construction, information search and encoding, and idea generation) are differentially related to both antecedents and specific types of creative outcomes. Using survey data from employees and their supervisors from a wide variety of organizations, we found that leader creative expectations were more strongly related to idea generation than to problem construction and to information search and encoding. Job autonomy, in contrast, was significantly related to problem construction, but not to information search and encoding or idea generation. Furthermore, we found that although idea generation is positively related to both radical and incremental creativity, problem construction is only positively related to radical creativity. We discuss implications for the study of creative processes and creativity more generally.
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, WORK, ORGANIZATIONS, WORKPLACE CREATIVITY, COMMON METHOD VARIANCE, Job autonomy, INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR, Creative process, MODEL, Sensemaking, PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT, Leader creative expectations, EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY, LEADERSHIP, Employee creativity
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, WORK, ORGANIZATIONS, WORKPLACE CREATIVITY, COMMON METHOD VARIANCE, Job autonomy, INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR, Creative process, MODEL, Sensemaking, PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT, Leader creative expectations, EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY, LEADERSHIP, Employee creativity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
