
doi: 10.1002/smr.1917
AbstractComputer‐based systems are now expected to evolve during their service life to cope with changes of various nature, ranging from evolution of user needs, eg, additional features requested by users, to system configuration changes, eg, modifications in available hardware resources. When considering resilient embedded systems that must comply with stringent dependability requirements, the challenge is even greater, as evolution must not impair dependability attributes. Maintaining dependability properties when facing changes is, indeed, the exact definition of resilient computing.In this paper, we consider the evolution of systems with respect to their dependability mechanisms and show how such mechanisms can evolve with the system evolution, in the case of ROS, the robot operating system. We provide a synthesis of the concepts required for resilient computing using a component‐based approach. We particularly emphasize the process and the techniques needed to implement an adaptation layer for fault tolerance mechanisms. In the light of this analysis, we address the implementation of adaptive fault tolerance on ROS in 2 steps: Firstly, we provide an architecture to implement fault tolerance mechanisms in ROS, and secondly, we describe the actual adaptation of fault tolerance mechanisms in ROS. Beyond the implementation details given in the paper, we draw the lessons learned from this work and discuss the limits of this run‐time support to implement adaptive fault tolerance features in embedded systems.
Resilience, ROS, ACM: D.: Software, Adaptive fault tolerance, 004, 620, [INFO.INFO-ES] Computer Science [cs]/Embedded Systems, [INFO.INFO-PF]Computer Science [cs]/Performance [cs.PF], ACM: H.: Information Systems, [INFO.INFO-PF] Computer Science [cs]/Performance [cs.PF], [INFO.INFO-ES]Computer Science [cs]/Embedded Systems
Resilience, ROS, ACM: D.: Software, Adaptive fault tolerance, 004, 620, [INFO.INFO-ES] Computer Science [cs]/Embedded Systems, [INFO.INFO-PF]Computer Science [cs]/Performance [cs.PF], ACM: H.: Information Systems, [INFO.INFO-PF] Computer Science [cs]/Performance [cs.PF], [INFO.INFO-ES]Computer Science [cs]/Embedded Systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
