
Background The Trial to Reduce Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus in the Genetically at Risk (TRIGR) is the first multicenter international type 1 diabetes (T1D) prevention trial to be undertaken. A unique feature of TRIGR has been recruitment of eligible pregnant women and enrollment of newborns for long-term follow-up assessments. Purpose Our purpose is to summarize the recruitment and retention strategies used to conduct TRIGR from the perspective of the study coordinators. Methods TRIGR was designed to test whether weaning to formula containing hydrolyzed versus intact cow’s milk protein would be efficacious in decreasing risk for development of T1D-associated autoantibodies and T1D among infants identified to be at increased risk for T1D based on their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) profile and family history. Multiple strategies tailored to local issues were required to enroll and follow the target number of infants. Results This study was conducted in the United States, Canada, Australia, and 12 countries in Europe. Of the 5606 mothers registered worldwide, 5000 of their infants were randomized. Of these, 2159 were HLA eligible and enrolled in the 8-month intervention and 10-year follow-up phases of this study. The TRIGR study met the accrual goal after 4.7 years of recruitment, 2.7 years longer than projected initially. Challenges included difficulty in finding fathers with T1D, a higher than expected rate of premature delivery among T1D mothers, and implementation of new privacy regulations mid-trial. The majority of participants were recruited from primary care antenatal clinics located near the study centers and from a general hospital or pediatric center that was affiliated with a TRIGR Study center. Internet and magazine advertisements were found to be useful for recruitment of families. Alternative follow-up strategies are offered to families who wish to reduce or discontinue participation. Limitations Our experience is limited to a single international multicenter trial. Conclusions TRIGR coordinators played key roles in the recruitment and intervention periods and continue to be instrumental in retaining families and children during the 10-year follow-up period for each child.
Adult, Male, Canada, : Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autres [D99] [Sciences de la santé humaine], International Cooperation, 610 Medicine & health, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods, Double-Blind Method, HLA Antigens, Pregnancy, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, : Multidisciplinary, general & others [D99] [Human health sciences], Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics/prevention & control, Australia, Infant, Newborn, HLA Antigens/genetics, Research Personnel, United States, Europe, 3004 Pharmacology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, 10036 Medical Clinic, Diet Therapy/methods, Female, Multicenter Studies as Topic/methods, Diet Therapy
Adult, Male, Canada, : Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autres [D99] [Sciences de la santé humaine], International Cooperation, 610 Medicine & health, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods, Double-Blind Method, HLA Antigens, Pregnancy, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, : Multidisciplinary, general & others [D99] [Human health sciences], Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics/prevention & control, Australia, Infant, Newborn, HLA Antigens/genetics, Research Personnel, United States, Europe, 3004 Pharmacology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, 10036 Medical Clinic, Diet Therapy/methods, Female, Multicenter Studies as Topic/methods, Diet Therapy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
