Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

How reliable is the assessment of Porotic Hyperostosis and Cribra Orbitalia in skeletal human remains? A methodological approach for quantitative verification by means of a new evaluation form

Authors: Rinaldo, Natascia; Zedda, Nicoletta; Bramanti, Barbara; ROSA, IRENE; Gualdi-Russo, Emanuela;

How reliable is the assessment of Porotic Hyperostosis and Cribra Orbitalia in skeletal human remains? A methodological approach for quantitative verification by means of a new evaluation form

Abstract

Intra vitam porous lesions of the skull (Cribra Orbitalia and Porotic Hyperostosis) are pathological conditions due to genetic or acquired chronic anaemia. They are the most reported skeletal lesions in human skeletal remains and are routinely used to assess health, hygiene and nutritional status of past populations. Despite the existence of a number of proposed classifications, there is no generally accepted classification system used by all, with clear advantages over the others. Here, we propose a new evaluation form (BoPLE-Bone Porous Lesion Evaluation) that takes in consideration all the observable features of bone porous lesions, integrating existing qualitative criteria for the evaluation of severity and healing’s conditions with a new quantitative analysis based on the count of pores per square centimetre. Porotic Hyperostosis and Cribra Orbitalia were investigated using the newly developed evaluation forms on 189 cranial bones from several distinct archaeological sites. Reliability and reproducibility of both existing qualitative scoring criteria and the new quantitative method were statistically tested. We believe that the new proposed classification system, which takes into consideration diverse parameters like surface area of lesion, location of lesion on cranial vault, and number of pits per surface area, represents a progress in the objective evaluation of porous bone lesions. Its use will allow the determination of the severity of the lesion and thus provide data to assess conditions of frailty in past populations.

Keywords

Bone porous lesions; Cribra Orbitalia; Evaluation form; Porotic Hyperostosis; Scoring standards; Archeology (arts and humanities); Anthropology; Archeology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green