
In 1998, A. Karimi and I.D. Landau published in the journal "Systems and Control letters" an article entitled "Comparison of the closed-loop identification methods in terms of bias distribution". One of its main purposes was to provide a bias distribution analysis in the frequency domain of closed-loop output error identification algorithms that had been recently developed. The expressions provided in that paper are only valid for prediction error identification methods (PEM), not for pseudo-linear regression (PLR) ones, for which we give the correct frequency domain bias analysis, both in open- and closed-loop. Although PLR was initially (and is still) considered as an approximation of PEM, we show that it gives better results at high frequencies.
Identification in stochastic control theory, [SPI] Engineering Sciences [physics], Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Filtering in stochastic control theory, closed-loop identification, Discrete-time control/observation systems, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, identification, System identification, bias analysis, recursive identification
Identification in stochastic control theory, [SPI] Engineering Sciences [physics], Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, Filtering in stochastic control theory, closed-loop identification, Discrete-time control/observation systems, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, identification, System identification, bias analysis, recursive identification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
