
pmid: 26648152
Objective: To analyze the performance of two surgical meshes of different compositions during the defect healing process of the abdominal wall of rats. Methods: thirty-three adult Wistar rats were anesthetized and subjected to removal of an area of 1.5 cm x 2 cm of the anterior abdominal wall, except for the skin; 17 animals had the defect corrected by edge-to-edge surgical suture of a mesh made of polypropylene + poliglecaprone (Group U - UltraproTM); 16 animals had the defect corrected with a surgical mesh made of polypropylene + polidioxanone + cellulose (Group P - ProceedTM). Each group was divided into two subgroups, according to the euthanasia moment (seven days or 28 days after the operation). Parameters analyzed were macroscopic (adherence), microscopic (quantification of mature and immature collagen) and tensiometric (maximum tension and maximum rupture strength). Results : there was an increase in collagen type I in the ProceedTM group from seven to 28 days, p = 0.047. Also, there was an increase in the rupture tension on both groups when comparing the two periods. There was a lower rupture tension and tissue deformity with ProceedTM mesh in seven days, becoming equal at day 28. Conclusion : the meshes retain similarities in the final result and more studies with larger numbers of animals must be carried for better assessment.
Telas Cirúrgicas, RD1-811, Abdominal Wall, Parede abdominal/cirurgia, Tissue Adhesions, Biocompatible Materials, Surgical Mesh, Polypropylenes, Hernia, Abdominal, Rats, Abdominal Wall/surgery, Animals, Surgery, Rats, Wistar, Hérnia Abdominal, Aderências Teciduais
Telas Cirúrgicas, RD1-811, Abdominal Wall, Parede abdominal/cirurgia, Tissue Adhesions, Biocompatible Materials, Surgical Mesh, Polypropylenes, Hernia, Abdominal, Rats, Abdominal Wall/surgery, Animals, Surgery, Rats, Wistar, Hérnia Abdominal, Aderências Teciduais
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
