
pmid: 36692895
pmc: PMC10946605
AbstractBackground and purposeThis study assessed the effect of patient characteristics on the response to disease‐modifying therapy (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsWe extracted data from 61,810 patients from 135 centers across 35 countries from the MSBase registry. The selection criteria were: clinically isolated syndrome or definite MS, follow‐up ≥ 1 year, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥ 3, with ≥1 score recorded per year. Marginal structural models with interaction terms were used to compare the hazards of 12‐month confirmed worsening and improvement of disability, and the incidence of relapses between treated and untreated patients stratified by their characteristics.ResultsAmong 24,344 patients with relapsing MS, those on DMTs experienced 48% reduction in relapse incidence (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45–0.60), 46% lower risk of disability worsening (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41–0.71), and 32% greater chance of disability improvement (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.09–1.59). The effect of DMTs on EDSS worsening and improvement and the risk of relapses was attenuated with more severe disability. The magnitude of the effect of DMT on suppressing relapses declined with higher prior relapse rate and prior cerebral magnetic resonance imaging activity. We did not find any evidence for the effect of age on the effectiveness of DMT. After inclusion of 1985 participants with progressive MS, the effect of DMT on disability mostly depended on MS phenotype, whereas its effect on relapses was driven mainly by prior relapse activity.ConclusionsDMT is generally most effective among patients with lower disability and in relapsing MS phenotypes. There is no evidence of attenuation of the effect of DMT with age.
marginal structural model, multiple sclerosis, Pediatrics, Recurrence, Medicine and Health Sciences, Relapse, Internal medicine, Marginal structural model, relapse, Incidence (geometry), Physics, Guillain-Barré Syndrome and Related Neuropathies, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Neurology, multiple sclerosi, Medicine, EDSS; Immunotherapy; Marginal structural model; Multiple sclerosis; Relapse, EDSS, immunotherapy, Immunotherapy, Multiple Sclerosis, Hazard ratio, Immunology, Clinical Neurology, Diagnostic Criteria, 610, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Proportional hazards model, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Multiple sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Rheumatology, Health Sciences, Humans, McDonald criteria, Proportional Hazards Models, Neurosciences; Neurology; Clinical Neurology, EDSS; immunotherapy; marginal structural model; multiple sclerosis; relapse, FOS: Clinical medicine, Confidence interval, Neurosciences, Optics, Diagnosis and Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis, Clinically isolated syndrome, Neurology (clinical), Physical therapy
marginal structural model, multiple sclerosis, Pediatrics, Recurrence, Medicine and Health Sciences, Relapse, Internal medicine, Marginal structural model, relapse, Incidence (geometry), Physics, Guillain-Barré Syndrome and Related Neuropathies, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Neurology, multiple sclerosi, Medicine, EDSS; Immunotherapy; Marginal structural model; Multiple sclerosis; Relapse, EDSS, immunotherapy, Immunotherapy, Multiple Sclerosis, Hazard ratio, Immunology, Clinical Neurology, Diagnostic Criteria, 610, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Proportional hazards model, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Multiple sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Rheumatology, Health Sciences, Humans, McDonald criteria, Proportional Hazards Models, Neurosciences; Neurology; Clinical Neurology, EDSS; immunotherapy; marginal structural model; multiple sclerosis; relapse, FOS: Clinical medicine, Confidence interval, Neurosciences, Optics, Diagnosis and Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis, Clinically isolated syndrome, Neurology (clinical), Physical therapy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
