Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Evaluation of the use of the California Mastitis Test, last test somatic cell count, or a computer automated algorithm for detecting intramammary infection at dry-off

Authors: Vasquez, Amy; Eicker, Steve; Godden, Sandra; Gorden, Patrick; Lago, Alfonso; Rowe, Sam; Nydam, Daryl;

Evaluation of the use of the California Mastitis Test, last test somatic cell count, or a computer automated algorithm for detecting intramammary infection at dry-off

Abstract

Selective dry cow therapy (SDCT), the identification and treatment of only cows or quarters that have or are at risk for an infection over the dry period, constitutes a prudent strategy when considering antibiotic use. Milk culture by a professional lab, which takes ≥ 1 day and may not be accessible to all dairies, is currently recognized as the gold standard for determining intramammary infections (IMI). Identification of cows or quarters for SDCT requires timely and cost-beneficial diagnostics with acceptable sensitivities (Se) and specificities (Sp) to decrease under, as well as overtreatment of animals at dry-off (DO). For this purpose, our objectives were to explore the test characteristics of the California Mastitis Test (CMT), use of the last-test DHIA somatic cell count (LTSCC), and use of an automated algorithm (ALG) based on sequential somatic cell count (SCC) and mastitis events to identify IMI in quarters and cows at DO using 2 categories of IMI (all or only major pathogens).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!