
This study used a novel word learning paradigm to investigate the role of morphology in the acquisition of complex words, when participants have no prior lexical knowledge of the embedded morphemic constituents. The influence of morphological family size on novel word learning was examined by comparing novel stems ( torb ) combined with large morphological families (e.g., torbnel , torbilm , torbla , torbiph ) as opposed to small morphological families (e.g., torbilm , torbla ). In two online experiments, participants learned complex novel words by associating words with pictures. Following training, participants performed a recognition and a spelling task where they were exposed to novel words that either did or did not contain a trained morpheme. As predicted, items consisting of a trained and an untrained constituent were harder to reject but easier to spell than those that did not contain any trained constituents. Moreover, novel words including trained constituents with large morphological families were harder to reject than those including constituents with small morphological families. The findings suggest that participants acquired novel morphemic constituents without prior knowledge of the constituents and point to the important facilitatory role of morphological family size in novel word learning.
Male, Adult, morphological structure, novel word acquisition, Psycholinguistics, Adolescent, 150, Recognition, Psychology, Original Articles, Verbal Learning, morphological family size, Vocabulary, 400, Semantics, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Female, written training
Male, Adult, morphological structure, novel word acquisition, Psycholinguistics, Adolescent, 150, Recognition, Psychology, Original Articles, Verbal Learning, morphological family size, Vocabulary, 400, Semantics, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Female, written training
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
