SummaryHuman life expectancy continues to rise in most populations. This rise not only leads to longer lives but is also accompanied by improved health at a given age, i.e. we see a reduction of biological age for a given chronological age in recent cohorts. Despite or even because of the diversity of biomarkers of aging, an accurate quantification of a general shift in biological age across time has been challenging. By comparing age perception of images taken in 2001 over a decade, we show that age perception changes substantially across time and parallels the progress in life expectancy. In 2012, people aged 70+ needed to look 2.3 years younger to be rated the same age as in 2002. Our results further suggest that age perception reflects the past life events better than predicts future length of life, i.e. it is written in your face how much you have aged so far, but does not predict well how fast you will age in the future. We draw this conclusion since age perception among elderly paralleled changes in life expectancy at birth but not changes in remaining life expectancies. We illustrate advantages of perceived age as a biomarker of aging and suggest that changes in age perception should be explored for younger age classes to inform on aging processes, including whether aging is delayed or slowed with increasing life expectancy.