
The data used in this study amounted to 15182 datasets consisting of 14 variables. Existing variables are divided into basic variables and additional variables. The basic variables consist of 5 variables namely Home ownership, Roof type, Wall type, Floor type, Defecation facilities. While the additional variables consist of 9 variables, namely employment, having money / livestock / jewelry deposits and others, welfare deciles, education, recipients of non-cash food assistance, recipients of productive assistance for micro enterprises, recipients of cash social assistance, recipients of family hope programs, and recipients of basic necessities. Using the naïve bayes algorithm classification method, the values of accuracy, precision, recall, and f-measure are 67.61%, 67.97%, 93.71% and 78.79%. The addition of additional variables to the basic variables resulted in an accuracy of 68.29% in the additional variables of education. This shows that by adding additional variables, the accuracy results are higher than using only basic variables, so that this study can be used as a recommendation in decision making on the implementation of determining the beneficiaries of the rehabilitation program for uninhabitable houses
330, Assistance program eligibility determination system Classification, 080105 Expert Systems, Uninhabitable House, 080199 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing not elsewhere classified, Naïve Bayes, 089999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified
330, Assistance program eligibility determination system Classification, 080105 Expert Systems, Uninhabitable House, 080199 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing not elsewhere classified, Naïve Bayes, 089999 Information and Computing Sciences not elsewhere classified
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
