
The advance in large multimodal models (LMMs) gives rise to autonomous bots that perform complex tasks using human-like reasoning on their own. The ability of large models to understand spatial relations and perform spatial operations, however, is known to be limited. This gap hinders the development of autonomous GIS analysts, travel planning assistants, and other possibilities of spatial bots. In this paper, we explore the impact of modality on the performance of LMMs in spatial planning tasks-specifically, retrieving a target brick by first removing all other bricks on top of it. Experiments demonstrate that what matters is not only the modality of the prompts (text or image), but also how informative the spatial descriptions are for the LMMs to complete the task. We propose novel concepts of task-implicit and task-explicit spatial descriptions to qualitatively quantify the task-specific informativity of prompts. Furthermore, we develop simple techniques to increase the spatial task-explicity of image prompts, and the accuracy of spatial planning increases from 26% to 100% accordingly.
102035 Data science, 102001 Artificial intelligence, 507003 Geoinformatik, GeoAI, 102001 Artificial Intelligence, 102035 Data Science, 507003 Geoinformatics, task-explicity, multi-modal prompts, spatial reasoning, large multimodal models (LMM)
102035 Data science, 102001 Artificial intelligence, 507003 Geoinformatik, GeoAI, 102001 Artificial Intelligence, 102035 Data Science, 507003 Geoinformatics, task-explicity, multi-modal prompts, spatial reasoning, large multimodal models (LMM)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
