
handle: 11285/651564
AbstractThe gender digital divide (GDD) is a phenomenon that refers to the inequalities and differences between men and women in accessing the digital ecosystem in various environments, such as the scenarios of Education 4.0. Bridging the GDD in access, use, and appropriation of technologies would promote the digital inclusion in spaces traditionally dominated by men. A systematic literature review was conducted using seven databases, considering Scopus and Web of Science. Through this, the factors with the most significant impact on the widening of this type of gap were identified. The findings suggest that the elements that limit the GDD are (a) access and use of technologies, (b) social barriers, and (c) gender stereotypes and roles. On the other hand, factors that need to be considered for the digital inclusion of women were identified as follows: (a) the mode of interaction with technologies, (b) digital competencies in Education 4.0, (c) the mode of technology‐mediated teaching and learning, (d) digital competencies in the workplace, and (e) digital participation. It is concluded that more digital inclusion strategies are needed to reduce the GDD, thus requiring greater participation from society and universities to achieve digital equity.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Political science, Social Sciences, Theory and practice of education, Gender Differences in Information and Communication Technology, Social psychology, Digital Divide, Sociology, Scopus, Psychology, Equity (law), Political science, LB5-3640, Computer network, Educational Technology, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, FOS: Psychology, World Wide Web, higher education, Digital divide, Physical Sciences, women, gender digital divide, The Internet, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, MEDLINE, FOS: Law, Digital inclusion, Digital Competence in Education and Workforce Development, Education, China / China, Gender Studies, HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS DE LA CONDUCTA::PEDAGOGÍA::TEORÍA Y MÉTODOS EDUCATIVOS, Inclusion (mineral), digital inclusion, Gender, Linguistics, Bridging (networking), Appropriation, Computer science, Universal design, Technology Attitudes, Digital Communication and Media Studies, Philosophy, Computer Science, FOS: Languages and literature, education 4.0, Education 4.0, Gender digital divide, Law
FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Political science, Social Sciences, Theory and practice of education, Gender Differences in Information and Communication Technology, Social psychology, Digital Divide, Sociology, Scopus, Psychology, Equity (law), Political science, LB5-3640, Computer network, Educational Technology, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, FOS: Psychology, World Wide Web, higher education, Digital divide, Physical Sciences, women, gender digital divide, The Internet, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, MEDLINE, FOS: Law, Digital inclusion, Digital Competence in Education and Workforce Development, Education, China / China, Gender Studies, HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS DE LA CONDUCTA::PEDAGOGÍA::TEORÍA Y MÉTODOS EDUCATIVOS, Inclusion (mineral), digital inclusion, Gender, Linguistics, Bridging (networking), Appropriation, Computer science, Universal design, Technology Attitudes, Digital Communication and Media Studies, Philosophy, Computer Science, FOS: Languages and literature, education 4.0, Education 4.0, Gender digital divide, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
